lucky13
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8240/f824060635fc40d5c1b7273c9df41bd440ae21f5" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 1478
Joined: Feb. 2007 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbd30/bbd308ca2f7791076b47c87d3e2a92f42be11b04" alt="" |
Posted: Mar. 08 2007,14:02 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc992/bc992727d02d4852c37d560432ba48cb3bba8ce2" alt="QUOTE" |
Quote (meltdown_override @ Mar. 07 2007,22:36) | Im thinking of disecting the 2.4 kernel and 2.6 kernel and seeing what I could mesh together to make things a little more punchier. Im still gonna keep jwm and use dillo. Does anyone have other suggestion I could try? |
What do you mean by dissecting and what do you intend to do with two kernels? "Mesh together" -- how do you intend to do that? And why? Many improvements from 2.6 are already backported in 2.4, and 2.4 retains a lot of legacy support dropped in 2.6. For the hardware you've described, there's really no justification for using a 2.6 kernel.
-------------- "It felt kind of like having a pitbull terrier on my rear end." -- meo (copyright(c)2008, all rights reserved)
|