newby
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8240/f824060635fc40d5c1b7273c9df41bd440ae21f5" alt="Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a60e2/a60e2c26f6e8794a3fdf92a8c9b694f5c4e45b79" alt=""
Group: Members
Posts: 171
Joined: June 2006 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbd30/bbd308ca2f7791076b47c87d3e2a92f42be11b04" alt="" |
Posted: July 12 2006,06:42 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc992/bc992727d02d4852c37d560432ba48cb3bba8ce2" alt="QUOTE" |
Here's a link to a Wired article suggesting how we can support DSL by integrating openMosix.
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/1,37293-0.html
If even a few hundred of us users clustered our systems, we could sell the computing power to support further development of DSL.
The source for the software is: http://www.purehacking.com/chaos/
The creditcard sized distro is so small it makes DSL look bloated. My suggestion would be to put it together as one of a series of Damn Small distros: Damn Small Linux, Damn Small - Not, & Damn Small Cluster. The value that DSL would bring to it is the use of fluxbox and other light-weight tools.
I can't hack the code, but I'd be happy to give processor time to support the cause.
Is anyone up for this?
newby
|