Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic
Pages: (2) </ [1] 2 >/

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: USB GRUB upgrade, my progress so far, and a question.< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
imhennessy Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 9
Joined: April 2007
Posted: June 26 2008,17:15 QUOTE

Hello all,
I've recently been playing around with some other distros, and decided to do it without installing GRUB on my HDD. That works just fine; I can just pop in a USB GRUB stick, enter my settings manually, and *POOF* Fedora 9 boots.

The problem is that my DSL 4.4 uses GRUB 0.91, and (it seems) the newer kernels need 0.97.  So far I've managed to totally trash my DSL stick's GRUB in a botched attempt to upgrade it ( no worries, I've backups somewhere).  I'm about to set off on a quest to redo my DSL stick and try to do it right.  In this case, doing it right will mean installing grub to the /boot partion of my fedora install, and using that to install the newer GRUB over the old one in my DSL stick.  This is instead of just trying to dd the GRUB stage_1 and stage_2 onto the DSL stick.

The question is:
why are we using such an old version of GRUB? is it size? or are there real compatibility issues that will doom my second attempt?

many thanks
ivan
Back to top
Profile PM 
^thehatsrule^ Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 3275
Joined: July 2006
Posted: June 26 2008,17:23 QUOTE

Quote
The problem is that my DSL 4.4 uses GRUB 0.91, and (it seems) the newer kernels need 0.97
I don't think it matters what bootloader you are using.
Back to top
Profile PM 
roberts Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 4983
Joined: Oct. 2003
Posted: June 26 2008,17:36 QUOTE

DSL v4 does not need a newer grub to work. Boot loaders are your choice.

I have posted a newer grub (v0.97) bootfloppy which is/will be required with the new version of DSL.
Back to top
Profile PM WEB 
curaga Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 2163
Joined: Feb. 2007
Posted: June 26 2008,18:32 QUOTE

Quote
and (it seems) the newer kernels need 0.97

What? Are you sure? I think it's more likely your filesystem has better support in 0.97 / you have ext2/3 using large inodes which weren't supported by even 0.97 but there's a patch for 0.97..

Robert, is there some specific reason to using 0.97 for Core?


--------------
There's no such thing as life. Those mean little jocks invented it ;)
-
Windows is not a virus. A virus does something!
Back to top
Profile PM 
imhennessy Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 9
Joined: April 2007
Posted: June 26 2008,18:50 QUOTE

Ok,

I have spent some time with my friend Google, and found a lot of people reporting that the reason they had trouble with kernels after 2.6.22 is that they had GRUB 0.91 or so, and needed 0.97.

No one reports that they know why this is so, and most of the info is from forums, saying that googling led to this conclusion.

There would seem to be no primary source for this information.

the search continues.
ivan

EDIT: I have been googling "grub no setup signature found"

EDIT mark 2: http://fcp.surfsite.org/modules....orum=11

is the single most comprehensive explanation of the problem I've seen.
Back to top
Profile PM 
8 replies since June 26 2008,17:15 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Pages: (2) </ [1] 2 >/
reply to topic new topic new poll
Quick Reply: USB GRUB upgrade

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code