DSL Ideas and Suggestions :: wish list for the new version, dsl 5.0



Quote (Juanito @ June 09 2008,04:06)
..sounds a bit like where I am with LFS (which I'm trying out to prepare myself for the new dsl) :)

Why take the easy route with LFS when you could write your own kernel in assembly code?
:D

jpeters, it's really not that hard. And it's also all about learning, and so every little bit is documented.
Quote (jpeters @ June 09 2008,03:36)
Quote (Juanito @ June 09 2008,04:06)
..sounds a bit like where I am with LFS (which I'm trying out to prepare myself for the new dsl) :)

Why take the easy route with LFS when you could write your own kernel in assembly code?

Even masochist know their limit :P
Quote (roberts @ June 09 2008,00:33)
Last outstanding issue is to update lua/fltk to use current libraries. Currently I have had to "double up" by using the old libraries in DSL v4. I am working on this with help from Florian. Once this is resolved I will post the first alpha cut.

Done. Now built using libstdc++.so.6 and libpng12.so.0
The issue tripping me up was a missing -lpng in the second g++ command to build murgalua-fltk.so.0.6.8
Quote (roberts @ June 09 2008,21:25)
Quote (roberts @ June 09 2008,00:33)
Last outstanding issue is to update lua/fltk to use current libraries. Currently I have had to "double up" by using the old libraries in DSL v4. I am working on this with help from Florian. Once this is resolved I will post the first alpha cut.

Done. Now built using libstdc++.so.6 and libpng12.so.0
The issue tripping me up was a missing -lpng in the second g++ command to build murgalua-fltk.so.0.6.8

Since this is a wish list, can you add a full apache install, maybe Beryl, oh and how about iTunes? PLEASE?! :laugh:

Anywayz, when you say done, do you mean that the first tinycore alpha is ready? Where at?
Next Page...
original here.