DSL Ideas and Suggestions :: wish list, 2.6

Quote

Does the patch you listed enable higher resolutions on the D600?

- no, it enables higher resolution on the D400 with Intel 855 graphics. Sorry, I was assuming the D600 would have the same graphics as the D400...

Quote (Juanito @ Jan. 27 2008,01:41)

Quote

Does the patch you listed enable higher resolutions on the D600?

- no, it enables higher resolution on the D400 with Intel 855 graphics. Sorry, I was assuming the D600 would have the same graphics as the D400...

How about your Xorg72 extension? I'm sure the monitor itself can handle 1280X1024, and is limited by the card.

[we're sort of getting off-topic here] - my card works fine with xorg72, give yours a go...

i'm all for the 'bare-base' approach. how're you going to solve the
'business card' image ? include business.uci with the iso ?

i can also verify that loading/startup and unloading/shutdown of packages
is a lot faster on non-unionfs.

also something i've always been wondering, do these cloop systems
'have' to be compressed? and iso? i.e is there any way to mnt a
tar.gz' (uncompressed)? i'm thinking that tar.gz is more universal than uci.

I think a bare tiny core may be likely. Details are still being considered.
Much will depend on how much I can easily do with the proto-type.
Other builds with included applications are also an option.

Using cloop could possibly allow to use existing uci extensions.
But of course that could be good or bad.
Bad because of modules and libraries. Not all existing ucis would work.

Does anybody have any experience with archivemount?
This would use fuse to mount a tar.gz.
That could be very interesting if speed is not impacted compare to cloop.

Next Page...
original here.